http://godislovechristianblog.wordpress.com/

The blogger has moved this blog to http://godislovechristianblog.wordpress.com/

The work you see posted below will remain up, but the blogger's continued work will be published at the Wordpress site in the above link, and not here.

Your Image of God Creates You - by the Rev. Richard Rohr

Since this is my blog, it is a place where readers anticipate finding only original work, and everything else posted here is my own creation. However, the following article by the Rev. Richard Rohr is one of the most important messages offered across the religious landscape. It is my joy to share it with you:

Your image of God creates you—or defeats you. There is an absolute connection between how you see God and how you see yourself and the whole universe. The word “God” is first of all a stand-in for everything—reality, truth, and the very shape of your universe. This is why theology is important, and why good theology and spirituality can make so much difference in how you live your daily life in this world. Theology is not just theoretical, but ends up being quite practical—practically up-building or practically defeating.

After years of giving and receiving spiritual direction, it has become obvious to me and to many of my colleagues that most peoples’ operative, de facto image of God is initially a subtle combination of their Mom and their Dad, or any early authority figures. Without an interior journey of prayer or experience, much of religion is largely childhood conditioning, which God surely understands and works with. But this is what atheists and many former believers rightly react against because such religion is so childish and often fear-based, even if their arguments are blowing down a straw man. The goal, of course, is to grow toward an adult religion that includes both reason and faith and inner experience that you can trust. A mature God creates mature people. A big God creates big people.

If your Mom was punitive, your God is usually punitive too, and you actually spend much of your life submitting to that punitive God or angrily reacting against it. If your Dad (or your minister or early God teachers) were cold and withdrawn, you will assume that God is cold and withdrawn—all Scriptures, Jesus, and mystics to the contrary. If all authority in your life came through males, you probably prefer a male image of God, even if your heart says otherwise. As we were taught in Scholastic philosophy, “everything is received according to the manner of the receiver.” This is one of those things hidden in plain sight, but still remains well hidden to most Christians.

Frankly, if your early authority figures were merciful and forgiving, you have a great big emotional head start in understanding the Gospel and who God might really be. This is why denominational affiliations in the end mean very little. Yes, good theology and preaching will help, but I have met evangelicals with very limited theology who are bright and alive. They invariably had a bright and alive upbringing, and their hearts tend to be generous.
I also meet Catholics and Anglicans with a more expansive theology who nevertheless are dour and dominating. They invariably had an early worldview that was all about counting, measuring, making inner lists, and doling out rewards and punishments. The expansive and open world of grace will actually be a scandal to them. They are upset because God is so “generous” (see Matthew 20:16). Such people find it sincerely hard to live in the frame of reference which Jesus calls “the Kingdom of God.” They are much more secure in a meritocracy of quid pro quo and resent anyone getting anything they have not worked for and “deserved.”

This is all mirrored in our political worldviews, of course. Good theology makes for good politics and positive social relationships. Bad theology makes for stingy politics, xenophobia, and highly-controlled relationships. No wonder that both Freud and Jung believed that low-level religion creates mostly “anal retentive” people, to use a rather unkind but truly descriptive phrase.

For me as a Christian, the mostly undeveloped image of God as Trinity is the way out and the way through all limited concepts of God. Jesus comes to invite us into that flow—which only flows in one entirely positive direction.

A deep thought not by Jack Handy

The False Self is broken. As for mine, I am tired of trying to "fix" it. We always want to fix broken material objects by putting them back together to restore material wholeness. This is the only way we conceive of healing: to restore a material broken state of being to its prior state of being, assuming the object was that way to begin with. To this, the Apostle Paul more or less says, "no, let's not fix it; it's better for it to die."

There is a new kind of wholeness that originates from outside this dualistic paradigm; the only one we conceive of, in which we focus on the material and its brokenness. We say the pieces are separate or are together, and we keep trying to fuse them into one. However, this new form of wholeness that originates from outside that paradigm, works from a transcendent position. The transcendent became material (incarnation), and applied itself to our broken state of being on the cross, without restoring the brokenness to its prior state of being. Thus, the cross is the height of signs - displaying and ushering into the material, this new form of wholeness that exists, while leaving the pieces separated (for now).

Truth: The First Casualty in Politics

I have a confession to make. This is particularly difficult because I am a writer. However, I just have to get this off my chest. So, here it is.

I can no longer buy a vowel.

There. I said it. Unfortunately, it gets worse.

I caught myself dreaming the other night. I said “I’ll take ‘I’m being lied to’ for $500, Alex.”

Every autumn, I end up feeling harassed by the bombardment of campaign ads filled with “half-truths” that “stretch” the facts. I believe this amounts to propaganda designed to deceive us. It is unbecoming of those who lead a nation so great and they should be ashamed of themselves - all of them. There is an unfortunate truth we cannot escape: if a politician’s lips are moving, he’s probably lying. Well, that’s what my grandmother always said.

Surely, at some point, some politician, lawyer or judge passed a statute to define terms like “truth” and “lie” so as to introduce semantics to Olympic gymnastics. I don’t know about you, but I’d like to introduce them to a new definition of “term limits.” They should have to go home and live under the laws they pass.

I don’t blame one party or the other - I blame partisanship. It’s not just politicians, either. It’s also any political action committee that has enough cash for airtime: these mysterious groups that put issues on the ballot. I don’t like that any schmuck who gets the signatures can bypass the General Assembly, threaten to alter the state constitution and flat out deceive voters in the interest of their avarice. These immoral people are trying to take advantage of us and it’s just flat wrong. At least politicians have to come into the light to lie to us; these people do it from some dark, smoke-filled corner somewhere without even telling us who they are.

Words cannot express how important it is for us to educate ourselves on the issues. We must seek out credible and objective sources. Most importantly, we absolutely must apply critical thinking.

The propaganda warriors are everywhere, using information as a weapon. We don’t always know who to trust, but we often let our guard down with any talking head who shares our opinions. We should think twice about this. Liberal, conservative; right, left. For every good point either side makes, there is a valid counter-point. No issue is simple enough that one side has the whole truth. We should think “outside the box” so we can gain understanding of a topic from within each vantage point. Only after we have considered every interest from within are we ready to make decisions that affect the whole. Only then are we ready to vote.

The liars have to be held accountable, so it’s up to us to speak truth to power. The problem is that we can’t do it if we take sides. If every American were non-partisan, candidates would have to fight for every vote - just like they do with independents and “swing voters.” Unpredictability in the electorate is one of our best sources of empowerment because it keeps politicians on their toes.

We lose leverage when we favor either political party. They don’t deserve to get elected easily; by serving up the rhetoric we want to hear. Nor do they deserve to get away with practicing deceit.

It’s up to you to hold them accountable. You can start by being unbiased and by thinking critically. It’s up to you to make them earn your vote.

Sectarianism Explained From Psychological and Neurological Perspectives

From health care insurance reform to Tea Party protests, Republicans and Democrats are embroiled in passionate conflict. Many residents hold deeply to their convictions and vote in a partisan manner. Politicians do the same, exacerbating conflict in a way that makes cooperation seem impossible.

Mayor Mike (name withheld) said he doesn’t see much polarization in city government; that it’s easier for people to talk things out and work together. County Commissioner Dan (name withheld) said the same is true at the county level. He believes partisan rancor becomes prevalent in state government and beyond.

“At the state and federal levels, power is more of a factor. Our power is limited — the Ohio Revised Code says what we can do and if it’s not on the list, we can’t do it. That’s the end of the discussion. Local government doesn’t write the laws or re-write them. Where we are guided by the law, state and federal politicians make the law and that’s the difference,” he said.

Partisanship is largely created when voters and elected officials attach their identity to their party and its ideology. For politicians, there are also many years of emotional and financial investment involved. One area expert says psychology can explain why politicians square off into polarized groups and argue like children while television cameras roll.

Pat (name withheld) is an assistant professor of psychology at the ... University. He says the dynamics involved in partisanship can be found, not only with politicians but also with many voters and religious people. He said the more committed and convicted, the more rigid people are and the more difficult it is for them to rationalize information they haven’t adopted as part of their self-concept.

“The level of involvement runs on a continuum from passive to active. Once a person begins to invest time and energy into something, they take ownership of the endeavor and it’s not just money; it’s an emotional investment. Their self-concept becomes attached to it and it becomes self-defining,” he said. “For politicians, this unfolds publicly. There’s also a group dynamic involved and the more the individual and the group speaks publicly on a topic, their position gains momentum and their commitment grows. They become more involved as they state their case and they become more polarized because it all unfolds in a group context.
“People can be great rationalizers on their own but when you put people together and they’re rationalizing to the same conclusions, they compound their rationalization and pool them together. This is like rationalization on steroids. Then, they become even more confident in their position. Confidence on steroids is called conviction. It’s difficult to reason with them because people are most open to outside rationale when there is less commitment.”

Another reason many devout partisans are often difficult to reason with is because of neurological activity. A 2006 study at Emory University used a functional neuroimaging (fMRI) machine to scan the brain activity of committed Democrats and Republicans. Partisans were shown statements made by their respective presidential candidate, Bush or Kerry. Then, they were presented facts which refuted what the participants’ own candidate had claimed. Subjects were also shown the other party’s candidate’s statements with the corresponding facts proving the statements false.

The study found no increased activity in the parts of the brain normally engaged during reasoning. Instead, a network of circuits associated with emotion became heightened. The university issued a press release that included this information and noted that once partisans had come to completely biased conclusions, they found ways to ignore information that could not be rationally discounted. Circuits that mediate negative emotions like sadness and disgust turned off and circuits involved in reward were stimulated in a way similar to what drug addicts receive when they get their ‘fix.’

A similar study at the University of California at Los Angeles in 2009 used an fMRI to study religious and secular participants. Similar findings were reported regarding subjects’ inability to rationalize when responding emotionally to stimuli they had defined themselves by and poured their self-concept into.

The professor said even when a partisan finds merit in contradicting facts or arguments, there is also a sense of history involved, which also prevents objective consideration.

“Ideas and values are handed down and people are invested in them. Even if they recognize the value of another idea or position, even if they recognize on some level that it’s more sensible, they’ve never adopted it,” he said. “They think ‘these are my viewpoints. They may not be perfect but they’re mine. They were my parents’ beliefs, they’re our tradition, they’re mine and I am standing by them. They help me navigate the world, give me meaning and they’re all I’ve ever known’.”

Fear often becomes a motivating factor for partisans who label and villianize persons, groups and ideas viewed as contradictory to their own. Therefore, those who think differently may be seen as a personal threat. This negatively reinforces fear and anger, making polarization more difficult to overcome.

“One’s self-concept is central to one’s life; you can’t break up with yourself. You can’t give the self a 2-week notice or move to a different self because you’re bored with yours,” he added. “The self is something we will never get away from. In the aftermath of 9/11, as the world seems increasingly unstable, we get scared and hold more firmly to the conservative ideals we’ve always known. The recession and the job market make conservative values especially attractive when we’re feeling threatened because it’s what we grew up with.”